A Personal Reflection on the Work
The Architecture of the Open Hand
Democratic Mysticism, Countercultural Ethos, and the Poetic Ontology of Smilegiving
❖ ❖ ❖
Introduction: The Lineage of the “Throughgift”
I wrote these poems in a season when so much of what I read felt armored — guarded by irony, turned inward toward alienation, broken on purpose into fragments. I don’t fault that impulse; the world gives us plenty to be guarded about. But I wanted to try the opposite thing. I wanted Smilegiving: The Collected Poems and its companion volume to be a small act of construction rather than dismantling — to imagine, out loud, that we might still build something warm together.
Whatever these pages reach for, they reach through the people who taught me. I owe an incalculable debt to Walt Whitman’s wide democratic breath, to Allen Ginsberg’s ecstatic nerve, to the restless roads of the Beats, and to the thin wild mercury of Bob Dylan and the long, forgiving jams of the Grateful Dead. I don’t consider myself their equal. I consider myself their grateful heir — someone who was handed a lamp and is simply trying to keep it lit and pass it on. If there is a single hope behind this book, it is that poetry might live not as a relic to be parsed but as a warm thing to be shared, hand to hand.
I. Philosophical Vision and Metaphysical Infrastructure
At the center of everything I’ve written sits one very simple idea, and I hold it more as a hope than a doctrine: that we are not, finally, in competition with one another. So much of modern life is arranged around scarcity and the transaction — what I give, I lose; what I keep, I have. I wanted to see whether a poem could quietly propose a different arithmetic. I’ve come to call it the economy of the open hand — the strange discovery that certain goods, like love and attention and mercy, seem to grow rather than shrink when they are spent.
The Spatiotemporal Matrix: Eternow and the Quantum Self
I’ve never made much peace with the anxious, forward-leaning way we’re taught to live inside time — always braced for what’s next, always haunted by what’s behind. In The Book For Giving I reached for a word to hold the feeling of a present moment gone quiet and holy, and what came out was eternow:
In Quantum Understanding I borrowed — carefully, and I hope not too clumsily — the language of physics to say something I believe about people: that once two lives are truly joined, they stay joined. “Two things once joined are joined for good.” I’m no physicist, and I don’t want to overclaim the science. I only mean it as a felt truth, the way forgiveness sometimes seems to arrive “before the asking, / the way the dawn forgives the night.”
The Vocabulary of Affirmation: Yesmile and The Givening
I found early on that the ordinary words weren’t quite carrying what I needed, so I made a few of my own. Yesmile and The Givening are little coinages, small hinges for the door. In The Givening I tried to break the abstraction of “kindness” down into things a person could actually do on a Tuesday:
- Smilegive: spending an unconditional greeting to catalyze relational warmth.
- Mindgive: projecting silent intentions of mercy, with no need for anyone to notice.
- Eargive: holding another’s ache like “clean water,” without flinching.
And there was one small etymological gift I stumbled on and have never gotten over: that forgive carries inside it the sense of give-before — grace handed down long before any apology is ever formed. I can’t take credit for that; the language was holding it all along. I only got to notice.
A Reply to Yeats
I want to be honest about one poem in particular, because I know how it could sound. The Second He Comes is written in direct conversation with Yeats’s The Second Coming — a poem so much greater than mine that I hesitated for a long time before answering it at all. I’m not trying to correct Yeats; I wouldn’t dare. I’m trying to answer a despair I recognize in myself with the only thing I’ve found that holds against it. Where he saw the center failing to hold, I wanted to imagine what it might mean for the center to hold differently:
In place of the slouching beast I put “a shape with a child’s body and the face of everyone,” whose “slow glad hands” teach the world’s indignant birds how to sing again. Maybe it’s naïve. I’ve decided I’d rather risk being naïve toward hope than fluent in despair.
II. Musicality, Counterculture, and the Poetics of the Breath
I hear all of this before I ever see it on the page. I grew up inside the sound of the 1960s and never really left it — rock and roll, folk storytelling, the drift of Eastern mysticism through American speakers. If the book vibrates like a jukebox, that’s not accidental. It’s the room I write in.
The Sonic Lineage
In Hippie Dreams I simply named my teachers out loud — Jimi Hendrix, Jack Kerouac, Neal Cassady as “Cowboy Neal,” the Beatles, Cream, the Byrds. It reads like a litany because to me it is one; these are the people I’m thankful for. In Looping Home I invite the reader to “Hum that old thin wild mercury tune,” and in Get Shown the Light I let the Dead’s Scarlet Begonias carry both the rhythm and the lesson — that light isn’t something we manufacture so much as something we are, now and then and by grace, shown.
The Holy “Conspiracy”
One word I love to dig under is conspiracy — con-spirare, to breathe together. In Co-Creator Conspiracy I wanted human relation to feel like shared breath, and I let the pronouns slip into one another on purpose, because I’ve never been fully convinced that the line between me and you is as solid as we insist. In pieces like No Time At All / All The Time I sped the rhythm up until it drums, hoping to jog the reader loose from analysis and back into the body, where the breathing actually happens.
III. Editorial and Artifactual Aesthetics
I cared about the physical book more than I probably should admit — the way it looks and holds and turns.
The Emblem
The book is anchored by an emblem I love: a heart that narrows to the nib of a fountain pen, with the globe cradled inside it, a chain of figures holding hands across the continents, and a dove lifting off with an olive branch. It’s not subtle, and I decided I was all right with that. It says the whole thing in one picture — the pen as a way of practicing empathy, the dove for peace, the linked hands for the plain fact of our belonging to one another.
Structure and Rhythm
The poems fall into five movements, and together they trace the journey I actually took — out of isolation and toward communion:
- I. The Doorway — welcome, wonder, the unlocking of the shut door.
- II. The Honest Dark — an honest look at division, national wound, and private grief.
- III. The Widening — the turn from solitary insight toward shared responsibility.
- IV. The Quiet Center — stillness, interconnection, and the setting-down of old guilt.
- V. The Turn Toward You — the handing of the book’s authority back to whoever is holding it.
It closes with what I call The Closing Trinity — What You Came For (the Crown), Jesus Smiled (the Cornerstone), and The Gift (the Bow). I used varying line-lengths, plain bold headers, and the glyph breaks (✵ ✵ ✵ and ❖ ❖ ❖) to let the eye breathe. I wanted it to carry a little dignity and still feel as approachable as a pamphlet pressed into your hand on a street corner.
IV. Reimagining the American Experiment
If there’s a civic hope in the book, it lives in the possibility of what I can only call radical hospitality — and it comes to a head in The Long Table: America at 250.
The Long Table and the Whitmanesque “Us”
I wrote it on the eve of the Semicentennial, and I made no secret of who I was leaning on — “Let me sing it the way Walt taught us to sing.” I wanted to skip past the marble and the monuments and bless the ordinary, working landscape instead:
The image I keep returning to is the country as a table that has to keep getting longer — where the work is to “drag up chairs for the ones left standing.” I didn’t want cheap flag-waving, and I didn’t want easy despair either. I tried to tell the truth: that the promise “came late, and at a terrible cost,” and that our unfinishedness isn’t a failure to mourn but a duty to accept. “We are not a finished people. / Thank God. The finished are only the dead.”
A Wider Table
In Jesus Smiled I set the Christian, Muslim, Jewish, and Buddhist paths down at the same table, as brothers rather than rivals:
That last line is the truest thing in the book, and I mean it without a trace of performance: they have much to teach me, for I have much to learn. I’m not standing at the head of any table. I pulled up a chair like everyone else, and I’m still mostly listening.
Conclusion: The Final Transmission
I decided early that I didn’t want this book to sit under glass. I included a transparent note about the ways I used technology to help draft and shape the prose, because it felt dishonest to hide it and because I don’t believe authorship has to be a fortress. A human vision moved the work; the tools only helped me carry it.
So the book is built to be given away. It ends by asking you to tear out its pages, text a stanza to someone white-knuckling their way through a bad midnight, leave the whole thing behind on a bus seat or a hospital chair. The companion volume isn’t a gatekeeper. It’s just me pulling out a chair and saying: sit, breathe, and when you’re ready, go past the book entirely.
If I’ve done anything worth keeping, it isn’t that I built a monument. It’s that — if I’m lucky — I managed to hand you the lamp still warm, still lit, and ready to be passed along. That thought gives me more joy than I know how to say.
❖ ❖ ❖
Smile first. Say yes. Give to others what you would receive.
© 2026 Rob Chavez · The Smilegiving Trust · smilegiving.com
A publishing and educational initiative of Smilegiving Creative Holdings LLC